[Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
9 messages Options
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

[Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Christian Schneider
We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a few
of the sub projects.

There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they are
typcially released by subproject:
- component-dsl
- cdi

So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.

Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
files.

Christian

--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Raymond Auge
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 9:50 AM Christian Schneider <[hidden email]>
wrote:

> We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a few
> of the sub projects.
>
> There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they are
> typcially released by subproject:
> - component-dsl
> - cdi
>

Yes please!


>
> So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
>
> Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> files.
>

If we archive a bunch of unmaintained things the outlook would probably
appear much better.

I can take a shot at archiving some things over the weekend. How do you
propose I do that? Just delete the contents of the subproject in the repo?
Should I send a warning per subproject?

I can probably start sending queries out today?

- Ray


>
> Christian
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>


--
*Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
 (@rotty3000)
Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
 (@Liferay)
Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org> (@OSGiAlliance)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Jean-Baptiste Onofré
In reply to this post by Christian Schneider
Hi

+1

I think we can move all to git and then split the repository (in two steps).

For the project already "isolated", no problem, it's already done ;)

Regards
JB

On 01/02/2019 15:50, Christian Schneider wrote:

> We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a few
> of the sub projects.
>
> There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they are
> typcially released by subproject:
> - component-dsl
> - cdi
>
> So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
>
> Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> files.
>
> Christian
>

--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
[hidden email]
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Christian Schneider
I agree. It is probably easier to first move to git and then archive the
unmaintained projects.
For the project we want to delete I propose we create a branch "attic" or
similar where we keep them and then
delete them from master.

For the two subprojects to extract I do not know which is the best way. We
could clone the full repo and then delete all that is not part of the
subproject but I do not know if this is very efficient. What do you
propsose there ?

Christian

Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
[hidden email]>:

> Hi
>
> +1
>
> I think we can move all to git and then split the repository (in two
> steps).
>
> For the project already "isolated", no problem, it's already done ;)
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 01/02/2019 15:50, Christian Schneider wrote:
> > We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a
> few
> > of the sub projects.
> >
> > There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they
> are
> > typcially released by subproject:
> > - component-dsl
> > - cdi
> >
> > So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
> >
> > Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> > subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> > So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> > live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> > files.
> >
> > Christian
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> [hidden email]
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>


--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Dominik Przybysz
+1

Pozdrawiam/Regards,
Dominik Przybysz

sob., 2 lut 2019, 07:49: Christian Schneider <[hidden email]>
napisał(a):

> I agree. It is probably easier to first move to git and then archive the
> unmaintained projects.
> For the project we want to delete I propose we create a branch "attic" or
> similar where we keep them and then
> delete them from master.
>
> For the two subprojects to extract I do not know which is the best way. We
> could clone the full repo and then delete all that is not part of the
> subproject but I do not know if this is very efficient. What do you
> propsose there ?
>
> Christian
>
> Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 16:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré <
> [hidden email]>:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I think we can move all to git and then split the repository (in two
> > steps).
> >
> > For the project already "isolated", no problem, it's already done ;)
> >
> > Regards
> > JB
> >
> > On 01/02/2019 15:50, Christian Schneider wrote:
> > > We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a
> > few
> > > of the sub projects.
> > >
> > > There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they
> > are
> > > typcially released by subproject:
> > > - component-dsl
> > > - cdi
> > >
> > > So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
> > >
> > > Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> > > subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> > > So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git
> and
> > > live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> > [hidden email]
> > http://blog.nanthrax.net
> > Talend - http://www.talend.com
> >
>
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Carlos Sierra Andrés-3
In reply to this post by Christian Schneider
+1

El 1/2/19 a las 15:50, Christian Schneider escribió:

> We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a few
> of the sub projects.
>
> There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they are
> typcially released by subproject:
> - component-dsl
> - cdi
>
> So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
>
> Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> files.
>
> Christian
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Christian Schneider
In reply to this post by Christian Schneider
Looks like there is broad support for the move to git. I will get the aries
repo converted to
git.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17806

Christian

Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider <
[hidden email]>:

> We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a
> few of the sub projects.
>
> There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they are
> typcially released by subproject:
> - component-dsl
> - cdi
>
> So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
>
> Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> files.
>
> Christian
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>
>

--
--
Christian Schneider
http://www.liquid-reality.de

Computer Scientist
http://www.adobe.com
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Daniel Estermann-2
I personally prefer git so I can't reject that proposal. +1

Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019 um 14:22 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider <
[hidden email]>:

> Looks like there is broad support for the move to git. I will get the aries
> repo converted to
> git.
> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17806
>
> Christian
>
> Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider <
> [hidden email]>:
>
> > We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a
> > few of the sub projects.
> >
> > There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they
> are
> > typcially released by subproject:
> > - component-dsl
> > - cdi
> >
> > So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
> >
> > Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> > subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> > So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git and
> > live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> > files.
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Christian Schneider
> > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >
> > Computer Scientist
> > http://www.adobe.com
> >
> >
>
> --
> --
> Christian Schneider
> http://www.liquid-reality.de
>
> Computer Scientist
> http://www.adobe.com
>
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: [Discuss] Move the aries repo to git

Grzegorz Grzybek
+1 very much

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

pon., 4 lut 2019 o 15:37 Daniel Estermann <[hidden email]>
napisał(a):

> I personally prefer git so I can't reject that proposal. +1
>
> Am Mo., 4. Feb. 2019 um 14:22 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider <
> [hidden email]>:
>
> > Looks like there is broad support for the move to git. I will get the
> aries
> > repo converted to
> > git.
> > See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-17806
> >
> > Christian
> >
> > Am Fr., 1. Feb. 2019 um 15:50 Uhr schrieb Christian Schneider <
> > [hidden email]>:
> >
> > > We discussed a while ago to move to git and actually have moved quite a
> > > few of the sub projects.
> > >
> > > There are some more projects we could move to individual repos as they
> > are
> > > typcially released by subproject:
> > > - component-dsl
> > > - cdi
> > >
> > > So for these I propose we also create individual git repos.
> > >
> > > Apart from that the remaining projects are too diverse to release by
> > > subproject. Still I think moving to git might make sense there.
> > > So I wonder if we could simply move the rest of the aries repo to git
> and
> > > live with the small disadvantage that a tag always also tags unrelated
> > > files.
> > >
> > > Christian
> > >
> > > --
> > > --
> > > Christian Schneider
> > > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> > >
> > > Computer Scientist
> > > http://www.adobe.com
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > --
> > Christian Schneider
> > http://www.liquid-reality.de
> >
> > Computer Scientist
> > http://www.adobe.com
> >
>